University of San Francisco
  Previous   font
  First-Year Students Go To Moot Court

The 2007-08 Moot Court executive board are (top, left to right) Stephanie Chen, advocacy director; Danielle Tizol, managing director; Matthew Poole, executive director; (bottom, left to right) Erin Schietinger and Jennifer Frost, topics directors.
April 8, 2008 -- Their heads filled with points of law and persuasive arguments, their stomachs with butterflies, nearly 250 first-year students completed their Moot Court requirement the weekend of April 5 and 6. Working in teams of two - a petitioner and a respondent in an appeal court setting - they prepared written briefs and oral arguments on topics ranging from torts (the use of animals as products for purposes of strict product liability) to the Fifth Amendment and employment law (the dismissal of a government employee for refusing to answer questions in an administrative hearing).

"We look for areas where the authority is split," explained Moot Court Case Counsel Stewart Kellar, 2L. "That gives both sides the opportunity to research and create credible arguments for their clients."

Case counsels started researching and creating fact patterns for 19 different cases last summer. They also coach and mentor the first-year students through the two-month Moot Court course. "Our own Moot Court is still fresh in our minds, so we really understand what the 1Ls are going through. It's one of the things that makes our student-run Moot Court program so successful," he continued.

Members of the USF School of Law class of '07 served as alumni judges during Moot Court weekend: (left to right) Eugene Kim, Cherie Beasley, Rob Lawton, David Mesa, Michelle Schuller, Matt Peters, Nicole Magaline, Jordan Jaffe.
The USF program is also unusual in that it encompasses both written and oral argument. "The sooner you have the experience of being in a courtroom, having to respond to judges' questions and then artfully return to your own argument, the better able you are to figure out the direction your career might take," said Stephanie Chen 3L, the 2007-08 Moot Court Board advocacy director.

The students argued before three-judge panels, drawn from a pool of local judges and attorneys, the majority of them alumni. This was the third year as a judge for Sunny Shapiro '02. "As a judge, I look for commitment to their client's cause and their ability to argue around the weaknesses in their case," she said. "USF prepares its students well and it is always exciting to see young lawyers showing their stuff."

Beyond the relief and exhilaration of completing one of the defining moments of any law student's experience, 38 students had even more to celebrate. Their judges honored them with best brief and best argument awards:

Topic Letter / Case Counsel

Best Brief

Best Oral Argument

A / Bambo Obaro

Matthew Adler

Monica Baranovsky

B / Stephen Hew

Sachi Clements

Elisa Cervantes

C / Leslie Bennett

Seth Nelson

Joseph Morris

D / Celine Mui

Jim Folger

Ashley Cornwall

E / Ellen Bass

Natalie Davis

Krista Henneman

F / Tiffany Yee

Anne Ho

David Kennedy

G / Cameron Cloar

Russell Ozawa

Kevin Christopher

H / Stewart Kellar

Andrew March

Judson McDougal

I / Joanna Giang

Matt Lewis

Donovan McKendrick

J / Jen Stanger

Amber Ingels

John Kirkham

K / Phillip Babich

Gregory Avant

Christina MacDougall

L / Katy Young

Allison Low

Negin Mohajeri

M / Amol Mehra

Erin Park

Michael Pasternak

N / Meredith Marzuoli

Devon Phelps

Elizabeth Mounts

O / Mia Marron

Martha Saracino

Aman Sebahtu

P / Andrea Fellion

Casey Truelove

Achal Srinath

Q / Jennifer Baker

Cru Ulrich

Caitlin Ward

R / Lailah Morris

Ning Yu

Sally White

S / Nazar Ghosseiri

Gwyndolen Thiessen

Erik Fitzpatrick




Bookmark and Share
 
 
  About USF Law | Prospective Students | Current Students | Academics | Faculty | Alumni Contact | Law Home