Hi! Did you know your browser is outdated? For a more robust web experience we recommend using Safari, Firefox, Chrome or Opera.
Tech Sector Roundtable 11.13.14_thumb
New Tech Sector Roundtable Engages Silicon Valley AlumniStory
Reunion2014_thumb.jpg
Alums Reconnect at the 2014 Reunion GalaStory
AYC 2014 winners and judges2_thumb
Katie Moran 2L Wins 2014 Advocate of the Year CompetitionStory
honigsbergp_thumb
Prof. Honigsberg Secures $500,000 Grant for Witness to Guantanamo ProjectStory
Legalpalooza056_thumb
Second Annual Legalpalooza! Introduces Students to Career Options and PractitionersStory
Serra Falk Goldman2_trustee_thumb
USF Trustees Welcome New MembersStory
SuperLawyers 2014 event_181_thumb
318 USF Alumni Named 2014 Super LawyersStory

Debate Examines Prop. 23

November 15, 2010

On Oct. 27, the USF School of Law Environmental Law Society hosted a debate on Proposition 23, an initiative on the Nov. 2 ballot that would have suspended California’s climate change law.

 

Proposition 23 was defeated by California voters by a 23% margin.

Alex Jackson of the Natural Resources Defense Council and Doug Halaand, consultant to the Republican Caucus, debated the initiative's pros and cons before a packed room of students. Halaand took the “Yes on 23” side, arguing that the state’s climate change law, AB 32, adversely impacts California’s economy and that it makes sense to suspend AB32 until the unemployment rate improves.

Jackson disagreed, asserting that California’s green energy economy is currently one of its fastest-growing sectors and that its growth depends upon upholding California’s climate law.

The event was moderated by Professor Alice Kaswan, who also introduced the speakers.

“The speakers helped the audience move past the rhetoric to illuminate the arguments for and against Prop 23—a proposition of great significance not only in California, but as a closely watched national barometer of the public’s willingness to take action on climate change,” Kaswan said.