Hi! Did you know your browser is outdated? For a more robust web experience we recommend using Safari, Firefox, Chrome or Opera.
Legalpalooza056_thumb
Second Annual Legalpalooza! Introduces Students to Career Options and PractitionersStory
Serra Falk Goldman2_trustee_thumb
USF Trustees Welcome New MembersStory
SuperLawyers 2014 event_181_thumb
318 USF Alumni Named 2014 Super LawyersStory
John Latino Educator award_thumb
Dean Honored With 2014 SF Latino Heritage AwardStory
Brand and Phair_thumb
Inaugural Brand Pursuit of Justice Fellow Heads to ThailandStory
Clinic win by Katie Finch
Criminal and Juvenile Justice Law Clinic Student’s Investigation Helps Exonerate ClientStory
Cometria Cooper_thumb
Cometria Cooper Named One of National Bar Association’s Top Trailblazers Under 40Story
IAP 2014 thumb
Students Hone Trial Advocacy Skills in Intensive ProgramStory

Politicos Find Agreement During Debate

February 01, 2011

Students, faculty, staff, and community members gathered in Fromm Hall on the USF campus Jan. 27 for a debate between two former congressmen, California Democratic Party Chairman and USF School of Law alumnus John Burton and former Libertarian Party Presidential Nominee Bob Barr.

Moderated by Federalist Society President Michael Brown 3L, the discussion between Burton and Barr centered on what Democrats, Tea Partiers, and Libertarians have in common.

On medical marijuana, Burton said it has always been an issue the Democrats have supported. Barr said the Tea Party seems to have distanced itself from the debate on this and other social issues, although the Libertarians would agree with the Democrats, reasoning that this is not an appropriate area for government to regulate.

Their views also overlapped on national defense spending. “It is a waste of resources when we engage in nation-building exercises,” Barr said, echoing Burton’s opinion on the value of the U.S. efforts in Afghanistan.

When it came to gun control and the 2nd Amendment, however, the two found little to agree upon. Although Burton favors strict gun control laws, he said it would be so difficult to enforce that the more important policy question relating to guns is safety issues. Barr said “you’re dealing with a fundamental human need or desire to defend oneself.” Still, he said some take that to the extreme by arguing for the right to possess weapons beyond a pistol or rifle, such as a semi-automatic weapon.

The event was sponsored by the USF School of Law Federalist Society.