Hi! Did you know your browser is outdated? For a more robust web experience we recommend using Safari, Firefox, Chrome or Opera.
CalBarScholarship2013_thumb
Two Students Receive California Bar Foundation Diversity ScholarshipsStory
Alyssa Bussey
Third-Year Student Externs with California Supreme Court Chief JusticeStory
Clay Logo Thumbnai
Four Alumni Honored as CA Attorneys of the YearStory
Fitzgerald
Paul J. Fitzgerald, S.J. Named President of the University of San FranciscoStory
Doris Cheng Story
Doris Cheng ’98 Named Director of Intensive Advocacy ProgramStory
Civil Rights News Thumb
Dean Trasviña Commemorates 50th Anniversary of Civil Rights ActStory
Scalia Podium
Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner Speak at USFStory
1Dollar Jacket
Faculty Book Offers Glimpse into Lives of the World’s PoorestStory

Politicos Find Agreement During Debate

February 01, 2011

Students, faculty, staff, and community members gathered in Fromm Hall on the USF campus Jan. 27 for a debate between two former congressmen, California Democratic Party Chairman and USF School of Law alumnus John Burton and former Libertarian Party Presidential Nominee Bob Barr.

Moderated by Federalist Society President Michael Brown 3L, the discussion between Burton and Barr centered on what Democrats, Tea Partiers, and Libertarians have in common.

On medical marijuana, Burton said it has always been an issue the Democrats have supported. Barr said the Tea Party seems to have distanced itself from the debate on this and other social issues, although the Libertarians would agree with the Democrats, reasoning that this is not an appropriate area for government to regulate.

Their views also overlapped on national defense spending. “It is a waste of resources when we engage in nation-building exercises,” Barr said, echoing Burton’s opinion on the value of the U.S. efforts in Afghanistan.

When it came to gun control and the 2nd Amendment, however, the two found little to agree upon. Although Burton favors strict gun control laws, he said it would be so difficult to enforce that the more important policy question relating to guns is safety issues. Barr said “you’re dealing with a fundamental human need or desire to defend oneself.” Still, he said some take that to the extreme by arguing for the right to possess weapons beyond a pistol or rifle, such as a semi-automatic weapon.

The event was sponsored by the USF School of Law Federalist Society.