Hi! Did you know your browser is outdated? For a more robust web experience we recommend using Safari, Firefox, Chrome or Opera.
Legalpalooza056_thumb
Second Annual Legalpalooza! Introduces Students to Career Options and PractitionersStory
Serra Falk Goldman2_trustee_thumb
USF Trustees Welcome New MembersStory
SuperLawyers 2014 event_181_thumb
318 USF Alumni Named 2014 Super LawyersStory
John Latino Educator award_thumb
Dean Honored With 2014 SF Latino Heritage AwardStory
Brand and Phair_thumb
Inaugural Brand Pursuit of Justice Fellow Heads to ThailandStory
Clinic win by Katie Finch
Criminal and Juvenile Justice Law Clinic Student’s Investigation Helps Exonerate ClientStory
Cometria Cooper_thumb
Cometria Cooper Named One of National Bar Association’s Top Trailblazers Under 40Story
IAP 2014 thumb
Students Hone Trial Advocacy Skills in Intensive ProgramStory

DJ Cespedes Wins Advocate of the Year Competition

October 22, 2013

On Oct. 18, Donald “DJ” Cespedes 2L won the USF School of Law Advocate of the Year Competition, the intramural appellate advocacy competition open to all upper division students who have completed the 1L Spring Moot Court Program.

From left to right: Judge M. Lynn Duryee ’79, AYC winner Donald “DJ” Cespedes 2L, Jennifer Sta.Ana 2L, Judge Kandis Westmore ’97, and Justice James R. Lambden.

The Advocate of the Year Competition provides an opportunity for students to develop and showcase their oral advocacy skills. Held in the Moot Court Room, Cespedes and Jennifer Sta.Ana 2L faced off in the finals of this year’s competition, in which 40 students participated.

The distinguished panel of judges included retired Justice James R. Lambden of the California Court of Appeal for the First District,  along with Judge M. Lynn Duryee ’79 of the Marin County Superior Court, and Judge Kandis Westmore ’97 of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

“Both of you were amazingly prepared and amazingly knowledgeable,” said Judge Duryee. “We were so impressed with your abilities to handle the questions that were asked, to turn negative parts of your case into positive parts of your case. Both of you were convincing, and quite charming. All three of us thought it was a quite joy to preside over your case, and we are so impressed with the work that has led up to this case.”

Additionally, best brief was presented to Alexander Bukac 2L, and Alexandra Martin 2L won best brief runner-up.

This year, the Advocate of the Year case involved two issues. First, whether and to what extent there is a clearly established First Amendment right to record police officers during the course of their duty. Second, whether and under what circumstances police officers may lawfully search the contents of a cell phone incident to lawful arrest without first obtaining a search warrant per the Fourth Amendment. Cespedes represented the petitioner, and Sta.Ana represented the respondent.