Hi! Did you know your browser is outdated? For a more robust web experience we recommend using Safari, Firefox, Chrome or Opera.
Grad_2013_speakers_thumb2.jpg
Class of 2013 Celebrates GraduationStory
Grads at Alum Grad night 2013_thumb
Alumni Graduates Dinner Celebrates Class of 2013Story
Rod Fong_thumb
Rodney Fong Joins Law School as Assistant Professor and Co-Director of Academic Support ProgramStory
Garvey_nuclear_book_cover_2thumb
Professor Garvey’s New Book Proposes Path to Nuclear CounterproliferationStory
Magee_thumb
Professor Rhonda Magee Wins USF’s Ignatian Service AwardStory
Alex Leenson

First Year Student Alex Leenson Awarded Peggy Browning Fellowship

Story
John Trasvina_thumb2
John Trasviña Named Dean of USF School of LawStory
Vargasm_thumb
Vargas Publishes Building Better BeingsStory
honigsbergp
The Witness to Guantanamo Project Completes 100 InterviewsStory

International Human Rights Standards Overview

This section provides a description of the international legal documents relevant to challenging JLWOP sentences and includes explanations of common international.

As stated by the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights:

A series of international human rights treaties and other instruments adopted since 1945 have conferred legal form on inherent human rights and developed the body of international human rights. Other instruments have been adopted at the regional level reflecting the particular human rights concerns of the region and providing for specific mechanisms of protection. Most states have also adopted constitutions and other laws which formally protect basic human rights. While international treaties and customary law form the backbone of international human rights law, other instruments, such as declarations, guidelines and principles adopted at the international level, contribute to its understanding, implementation and development. Respect for human rights requires the establishment of the rule of law at the national and international levels. International human rights law lays down obligations which states are bound to respect. By becoming parties to international treaties, states assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect and to fulfil human rights. The obligation to respect means that states must refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights. The obligation to protect requires states to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses. The obligation to fulfill means that states must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights. Through ratification of international human rights treaties, governments undertake to put into place domestic measures and legislation compatible with their treaty obligations and duties. Where domestic legal proceedings fail to address human rights abuses, mechanisms and procedures for individual complaints or communications are available at the regional and international levels to help ensure that international human rights standards are indeed respected, implemented, and enforced at the local level.