Click here to view a .pdf version of the Academic Honor CodeI. PurposeAs a Jesuit institution committed to cura personalis—the care and education of the whole person—USF has an obligation to embody and foster the values of honesty and integrity. USF upholds the standards of honesty and integrity from all members of the academic community.
This Honor Code applies to all students (undergraduate and graduate) in the College of Arts and Sciences, the School of Management and the School of Nursing and Health Professions. Faculty and students in the School of Education and the School of Law should consult their own schools for proper procedures. Students enrolled in distance learning (online courses) are subject to these policies as well as supplemental policies set forth by their program.
II. The Honor PledgeAll USF students will uphold the Honor Code by adhering to the core values of the university and supporting its mission to guide their academic careers and educational experiences.
USF Academic Honor Pledge
I pledge to demonstrate the core values of the University of San Francisco by upholding the standards of honesty and integrity, excellence in my academic work, and respect for others in my educational experiences, including supporting USF’s mission.
III. Standards of Conduct Adherence to standards of honesty and integrity precludes engaging in, causing, or knowingly benefiting from any violation of academic integrity. Without regard to purpose, the following violations are prohibited.
A. Cheating Cheating is the use or attempted use of unauthorized materials, information, and study aids, as well as unauthorized collaboration on examinations and other academic exercises. It is the responsibility of students to consult with their professors concerning what constitutes permissible collaboration. Cheating or helping others cheat is academic fraud.
B. PlagiarismPlagiarism is the act of presenting, as one’s own the ideas or writings of another; plagiarism, in any of its forms, violates academic integrity. While different academic disciplines have different norms of attribution, all strive to recognize and value individuals’ contributions to the larger body of knowledge. It is the responsibility of students to consult with their professors in order to understand the norms of attribution in each discipline and area of study.
C. False CitationsFalse citation is attribution to an incorrect or fabricated source; false citation is academic fraud. False citation seriously undermines the integrity of the academic enterprise.
D. Submitting the Same Work for Multiple AssignmentsStudents may not submit work (in identical or similar form) for multiple assignments without the prior, explicit approval of all faculty to whom the work will be submitted. This includes work first produced at USF or at another institution attended by the student.
E. Submitting False DataFalse data is information that has been fabricated, altered, or contrived in such a way as to be misleading; the submission of false data is academic fraud.
F. Falsifying Academic DocumentationForging or altering academic documentation (including transcripts, signatures, letters of recommendation, certificates of enrollment or standing, registration forms, and medical certifications) concerning oneself or others is academic fraud.
G. Abuse of Library PrivilegesDepriving others of equal access to library materials constitutes a violation of academic integrity. This includes sequestering library materials for the use of an individual or group, refusal to respond to recall notices, and the removal or attempt to remove library materials from any University library without authorization.
H. Abuse of Shared Electronic MediaDepriving others of equal access to shared electronic media used for academic purposes constitutes a violation of academic integrity. This includes actions that result in the damage or sabotage of campus computer systems.
IV. Academic Honesty Committee: Role and Membership
The Academic Honesty Committee is responsible for oversight of the Honor Code and shall investigate alleged Honor Code violations, and resolve and award sanctions when appropriate. The Academic Honesty Committee does not have the authority to change a student’s grade.
The Academic Honesty Committee is a representative group of faculty, students, and administrators from the College of Arts and Sciences, the School of Business and Professional Studies, the School of Education, and the School of Nursing. Ordinarily, members include: three faculty from the College of Arts and Sciences, one faculty from the Schools of Business and Professional Studies, Education, and Nursing, two undergraduate students, and one graduate student. The University of San Francisco Faculty Association (USFFA) and the Provost Council jointly appoint the faculty and administrative members. The ASUSF and the Provost’s Council select the student representatives.
The Chairperson is appointed by the Provost for a term of two years and is a non-voting member unless the members are evenly split on a decision regarding an Honor Code violation. Other members serve for a minimum of two years; ideally members from the same department serve staggered terms. Academic Honesty Committee members administer the Honor Code and educate students, staff, faculty, and administrators about their academic responsibilities. Scheduling problems and other circumstances may alter committee makeup and length of terms.
A staff person in the Office of the Provost keeps all written or recorded information related to the business of the Academic Honesty Committee on a password protected server.
V. Possible Violations of the Honor Code
If a faculty member suspects that a student has violated the Honor Code, the faculty member notifies the student to give him/her an opportunity to respond to the allegation. If the faculty member concludes that a violation has occurred, s/he may do any or all of the following: issue a warning, lower the grade, assign a failing grade. The faculty member is encouraged to report the incident to the Academic Honesty Committee at academichonesty@usfca.edu If a student challenges the allegation of violation of the Honor Code, s/he may refer the matter to the Academic Honesty Committee.
If a member of the University Community (faculty member, staff, administrator or student) believes that a student has violated the Honor Code, s/he may notify the Academic Honesty Committee at academichonesty@usfca.edu
When a sanction has been imposed by the faculty member for an Honor Code violation and referred to the Academic Honesty Committee, the student's name will be placed in a password protected Academic Honesty database maintained in the Office of Student Conduct, Rights and Responsibilities in University Life. This database will assist in identifying students who may repeatedly violate the Honor Code. Those students who repeatedly violate the Honor Code will be forwarded to the Academic Honesty Committee for further action.
Information related to violations of the Honor Code will be kept for up to seven (7) years in a secure, confidential file in the appropriate Associate Dean’s office.
When a violation is reported to the Academic Honesty Committee, the process that follows occurs in the following stages: A) Referral, B) Investigation, C) Resolution, D) and Sanction.
A. ReferralAny serious or repeat violation of the Honor Code or unsuccessful resolution by an instructor is referred to the Academic Honesty Committee. The referring individual submits a signed written report to the Academic Honesty Committee, which describes the incident in detail. The Chairperson of the Academic Honesty Committee will contact the alleged violator and referring individual to discuss the alleged violation and the process and procedure for investigation, resolution and imposition of a sanction, if appropriate.
B. InvestigationWhen an alleged violation is referred to the Academic Honesty Committee, the Chairperson of the Academic Honesty Committee may investigate the allegation or appoint, as appropriate, two committee members (a faculty/administrator and a student) to investigate the allegations and report their findings to the Academic Honesty Committee.
i. Making reasonable efforts to interview the student(s), the complainant(s) and the potential witnesses, the investigators gather information relating to the alleged violation. Investigations are expected to take no longer than two weeks from the time of the initial referral, at which time a written report is submitted to the Academic Honesty Committee. If the investigators differ in their conclusions, separate reports may be submitted.
ii. If the Academic Honesty Committee determines that there is insufficient evidence, the report of the violation will be dismissed and the outcome reported to the student, the reporting individual, and the Associate Dean of the student’s school or college.
iii. If the Academic Honesty Committee determines that there is sufficient evidence of a violation, resolution will follow.
C. ResolutionIn preparation for the hearing:
The Academic Honesty Committee Chair will schedule a hearing, to be held at least 15 working days from the time of the Academic Honesty Committee’s determination to pursue a violation. The student(s) will be notified in writing of the hearing date and the alleged violation(s). The letter to the student(s) shall include:
- A copy of the Honor Code;
- A summary of the allegations;
- A list of expected witnesses and evidence;
- The date, time, place of the hearing;
- The names of the Academic Honesty Committee members; and
- The rights of the student.
i. The Academic Honesty Committee Chair prepares all materials to be considered at the hearing and makes them available to the student charged with academic dishonesty, the person making the charge, and the Academic Honesty Committee at least five (5) working days before the hearing.
ii. Evidence that the student wishes to submit in response to the allegations must be submitted to the Academic Honesty Committee Chair for distribution at least 48 hours before the hearing; it is at the discretion of the Academic Honesty Committee to consider any evidence submitted after that time.
Rights of charged student at the hearing include:
i. To be allowed reasonable time to prepare for the hearing (no less than 10 working days after being notified of the hearing date).
ii. To select a support person to be present as an observer during the hearing; legal counsel is not permitted.
iii. To be present at the hearing. The charged student may waive his/her right to attend in which case the hearing may proceed without the student.
iv. To present evidence or witnesses. The charged student must inform Academic Honesty Committee regarding requests for witnesses at least 5 working days before the scheduled hearing. The student is responsible for notifying his/her witness(es) of the hearing date, time, and location.
v. To waive any rights associated with the hearing as provided by the Honor Code.
vi. To receive a written report from the Academic Honesty Committee.
Hearing Procedures guidelines:
i. There must be a quorum of Academic Honesty Committee members present, a minimum of 2/3 or 6 of its 9 members.
ii. The Academic Honesty Committee Chairperson or a designee presides over the hearing and determines all procedural matters prior to and during the hearing.
iii. If a student fails to appear at a scheduled hearing, the hearing may be held and the matter resolved without the student present.
iv. The hearing will be closed to the public in all cases.
v. In matters involving multiple students, their cases may be heard in a single hearing. If all students do not consent to a joint hearing, the same Academic Honesty Committee will hear their cases separately.
vi. Any witness, other than the charged student, is present only for his/her testimony.
vii. The Academic Honesty Committee shall decide via secret ballot whether the student is “in violation,” of the Honor Code. A majority of Academic Honesty Committee members must vote “in violation” in order for sanctions to be imposed.
viii. If the Academic Honesty Committee determines the student is “in violation” of the Honor Code it will impose: a letter of censure in the student’s academic file; suspension from the University; or a recommendation to the Provost for dismissal or denial/revocation of a degree.
If the Academic Honesty Committee determines that the student is "not in violation" of the Honor Code, the student may pursue a Grade Appeal if appropriate to the incident.
ix. Once the Academic Honesty Committee reaches a decision, the chairperson of the Academic Honesty Committee will communicate in writing directly to the student, the reporting individual, the Associate Dean of the student’s school or college, and the Provost the outcome of the hearing.
x. The decision of the Academic Honesty Committee is final and binding.
xi. The Academic Honesty Committee prepares a written report, detailing the evidence considered, final decision, and reasons for its decision, which is submitted to the Office of the Provost.
D. Sanctionsi. Letter of Censure
These guidelines will be used, without regard to mitigating or exacerbating circumstances, by the Academic Honesty Committee to determine the sanction that is most appropriate for the violation committed. Sanctions will be based on the severity of the violation. For offenses not expressly addressed in these guidelines, the Academic Honesty Committee should consider the general principles they convey.
A Letter of Censure is the least severe sanction recommended by the Academic Honesty Committee to the student’s Dean. It describes the Honor Code violation and is placed in the student’s academic file, which is retained in the Registrar’s Office. The letter is kept there until graduation, at which time it is destroyed.
Offenses for which a Letter of Censure is an appropriate sanction are often characterized by a combination of deceit, ignorance, and confusion on the part of the accused. Examples of when a Letter of Censure is appropriate include, but are not limited to:
- Submitting the same paper written by the student, or portions thereof, in multiple courses without permission or attribution;
- Collaboration on an assignment where collaboration was not allowed;
- Including false or improper citations in the assignment.
ii. Suspension
Suspension is the intermediate level sanction recommended by the Academic Honesty Committee to the student’s Dean. Suspension will typically be imposed for one semester, but may be imposed for two semesters. Suspension is noted on the student’s transcript at the end of the semester’s entries in which the violation occurred: “Suspension: Violation of Honor Code.”
Offenses for which Suspension is an appropriate sanctions are extensive, grave and/or serious first-time violations, or for a repeat violation of a lesser offense. Examples of offenses in which Suspension is the appropriate sanction include, but are not limited to:
- Complete or partial plagiarism on a paper;
- Cheating on a test;
- Unauthorized collaboration on a project;
- Altering a graded assignment for regrading.
iii. Dismissal from the University or Revocation of a Degree
Dismissal from the University or revocation of a degree is the most severe sanction recommended by the Academic Honesty Committee to the student’s Dean and the Provost. Dismissal is noted on the student’s transcript at the end of the semester’s entries in which the violation occurred: “Dismissal: Violation of Honor Code.” If a student has already received a degree from the University, the President or Provost of the University may revoke the degree. The sanction will be entered permanently on the student’s record.
Dismissal from the University or revocation of a degree is appropriate for serious, grave, and/or extensive first-time or repeat offenses such as altering one’s academic transcript. It is also reserved for situations in which efforts to educate the student on the importance of academic integrity and to reform his/her behavior have not worked, and the Academic Honesty Committee believes it is appropriate to permanently remove the student from the University. Dismissal is also appropriate if a student has previously committed one or more Honor Code violations with suspension and has committed another violation after return from suspension.