|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Ambiguity regarding sin
- Therapeutic models
- Need for a Recovery of Sin
- Which requires confession
- Forgiveness
- Reconciliation
- Ongoing conversion
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Not an original focus on sin as “crime,” but as a mis-guided search for
God
- Or as a failure in the Covenant
- Or as a failure to live out our identity as a New Creation in the
Christian Discipleship Community
|
|
9
|
- Old Testament Views
- Grounding in the Covenant
- The Decalogue as the “Ten Holy Words”
- Role of the prophets as call to
social concern and consciousness
- Day of Atonement ( Yom Kippur)
|
|
10
|
- Basic vocabulary from Hellenistic culture
- `"µ"DJ4" (hamartia) missing the mark
- ß$D4H (hubris) pride
- "*464“(adikia) “wrongdoing”
- Leading to µ,J"vo4" (metanoia) turning towards/back, a
“re-thinking”
- leading to a conversion, which can be
- Basic and core to the person
- as well as ongoing and deepening
|
|
11
|
- Greek word B,4D"Fµ@F ( peirasmos) and/or B,4D".o ( peirazo)
- The primary meaning is "test or trial”
- and only the secondary meaning is "temptation as enticement to
sin."
|
|
12
|
- Individuals and whole communities are tempted. Cf. Gn 22:1-19 [Abraham],
- and in Wisdom Literature as well.
- Humans, both individuals as well as communities also "tempt"
God: Israelites in the desert, Gideon, etc.
|
|
13
|
- Jesus' " temptations"
in the desert
- reality (i.e., the real world has testings)
- Temptations of Jesus: to deflect
Jesus from obedience to God.
- Pay attention to the paradigm of his response, seen also as a corrective
or counter-example to Israel's failed response to the testings.
|
|
14
|
- Less danger of scruples and
neurotic guilt with the biblical
understanding of "trials and testings”
- Interconnection and interrelation between trials and temptations and correction by God
- In this context, consider the following from Hebrews 12:4-11
|
|
15
|
- Call to Metanoia (Conversion) linked to…
- Call to Discipleship linked to …
- Jesus’ own mission…
- A mission of liberation and healing
- NOT a mission of condemnation & punishment
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Original Sin
- Species of Personal Sin, cf. Catechism
of the Catholic Church #1855
- Mortal (death-dealing)
- Venial (“forgiveable”--sin by analogy according to Thomas Aquinas)
- Primarily sin was seen as a result of “discrete” acts committed by
individuals
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Latin translation
- The nuance seems to be more of a deliberate act of doing evil, a “crime”
against the “law.”
- The Latin probably doesn’t grasp the range of meanings of the vocabulary
of sin in Greek and Hebrew.
|
|
21
|
- Grave Matter
- Sufficient knowledge, awareness and reflection
- Sufficiently "Full" Consent of the Will
- These three conditions must be simultaneously present before the act is
committed.
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- State of Grace and State of Sin were often presented as a sharply
dichotomous position, like the “on” or “off” light switch
- One day you could be in the state of grace, then the next in mortal sin,
then back in grace, and so on
- Belief that the act alone changed the balance…
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- While this approach seemed to fit very well with both the notion of sin
as a grievous act
- And with the notion that our good acts pleased God
- Is this approach actually in accord with the best possible understanding
of how God is, and how God deals with us? …
|
|
29
|
- Searching for God
- Finding God and Following God
- Expressed in a Covenantal Relationship
- Remaining faithful to God
- Turning back to God
- For Christians this is done in the Discipleship Community
- Yet the Pre-Vatican II moral manuals stressed an individualistic,
act-centered vision of morality
|
|
30
|
- Matthew 6:19-21 "Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth,
where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But
store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moth and rust do not
destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your
treasure is, there your heart will be also.”
|
|
31
|
- Matt 6:22-23 "The eye is the
lamp of the body. If your eyes are good, your whole body will be full of
light. But if your eyes are bad, your whole body will be full of
darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that
darkness!”
|
|
32
|
- Matt 6:24 "No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the
one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the
other. You cannot serve both God and Money.”
|
|
33
|
- Jeremiah 17: 9-10: “The heart is devious above all else; it is
perverse-- who can understand it? 10 I the LORD test the mind and search
the heart, to give to all according to their ways, according to the
fruit of their doings. ”
- 1 Cor 4: 3b-5: “I do not even judge myself. 4 I am not aware of anything
against myself, but I am not thereby acquitted. It is the Lord who
judges me. “
|
|
34
|
- 1 Cor 4: 5: “5 Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time,
before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in
darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart. Then each one will
receive commendation from God.”
|
|
35
|
- Lost sheep
- Not good business sense
- We are each one of us unique and therefore absolutely valuable to God
- Lost Drachma
- Merciful Father and the Prodigal Son
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Prayer of the disciples: the Our Father ("Lead us not into
temptation"):
- This should not be understood as a wish for no trials in this world.
- Rather Jesus is teaching his disciples to ask God not withdraw from
them,
- and to guard them against temptation by ungodly powers.
|
|
39
|
- Jesus also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they
were righteous and regarded others with contempt. “Two men up to the temple to pray, one
a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee… prayed ‘God I thank you
that I am not like other people: thieves, rogues, adulterers, or even
like this tax collector. I fast
twice a week; I give a tenth of all my income.
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
- Helps us to see more clearly the Relation aspect of the States of Grace
or Sin
- Takes more seriously the core nature of this relationship and how our
individual acts can either strengthen or weaken this relationship
- Helps us differentiate sin along a spectrum of venial to serious to
mortal
|
|
42
|
- Post-Vatican II attempt to give a sounder theological anthropology
- And a sounder understanding of the true reality of sin and its effect on
our relationship with God
- Does not change the fundamental understanding of sin itself
- But rather the vocabulary for speaking about this reality of sin
|
|
43
|
- Basic to F.O. theory is the premise that all adults to become truly
human must orient themselves to what they consider to be the ultimate
absolute in life, either God or a false god (such as money, power, etc.)
- This basic choice is “athematic” since no one can see his/herself in
totality
- Only God can see the person in this way
|
|
44
|
- Basic or Core
- Enables the human person to orient him/herself to the Absolute
- Cannot be intentionally “chosen” or “seen” in a given moment in time,
such as “I now dedicate my life to Jesus”
- Categorical (act-centered)
- Can be lessened by other factors such as fear, passion, sub-conscious
factors
- But which is intentional & discernible by the person
|
|
45
|
- Acts which are consistent with the F.O.
- Therefore strengthening it
- These acts can be of varying degrees of importance
- And involve varying levels of freedom
- Some examples..
- Acts which are inconsistent with the F.O.
- Therefore weakening it
- These acts can be of varying degrees of importance
- And involve varying levels of freedom
- Some examples..
|
|
46
|
- The Fundamental Option can change
- Though since the F.O. is the core relation between a person and their
transcendental absolute (e.g., God or idol) this relation would not
change easily
- Yet, if the relation is weakened enough it might shift…
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- Bob & Carol marry
- Marriage relationship has more “downs” than “ups”
- Each becomes progressively more self-centered
- And hateful to the other
- Ted & Alice marry
- Marriage relationship has more “ups” than “downs”
- Love bond is strengthened and grows
- Each grows closer to the other
|
|
49
|
- Bob is unfaithful to Carol
- This is a single, serious act
- A final straw
- Which symbolizes and effects the end of the relationship
- Ted is unfaithful to Alice
- This is a single, serious act
- But since their marriage is strong
- Though weakened the union survives
|
|
50
|
- Helps us to see more clearly the Relation aspect of the States of Grace
or Sin
- Takes more seriously the core nature of this relationship and how our
individual acts can either strengthen or weaken this relationship
- Helps us differentiate sin along a spectrum of venial to serious to
mortal
|
|
51
|
- Ministries founded in “charisms”—special “graces”
- Diversity: each person is unique and has his or her special gift and
task
- Yet, the variety of gifts are held together in the unity of the Spirit,
- And exercised for the good of the community
|
|
52
|
- What does it mean to “catch” someone?
- Not in the web of sin, but in the net of God’s grace
- Thus, the primary Gospel response to sin and injury is not punishment
and retaliation,
- but forgiveness and reconciliation.
- St. Paul speaks of this as being a “ministry” of the Church, and in this
spiritual ministry we are all “ambassadors of Christ” (cf. 2 Cor 5:
18-21).
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
- The initial development of the theology of sin, and the sacramental,
canonical, and theological responses all focused on the individual
paradigm
- Is this paradigm fully accurate?
- Are there aspects overlooked?
- Does this capture the full range of Biblical views on sin and
sinfulness?
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
- Insights from Liberation Theology
- A “Thicker” Description of Sin and Evil
- However, This Requires a “Paradigm Shift”
- 2 Key “Sticking Points”
- Sinful “Structures” which go beyond individual, moral acts
- Social sinfulness which goes beyond individual personal culpability
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
- This person’s?
- Or his parents’?
|
|
65
|
- Difficulties connected to Liberation Theology
- Problematic of Social Analysis
- Ambiguity regarding Culpability
- Lack of a tradition of a theology of social sin
- How to Respond Sacramentally?
- Need for a theology of social grace
|
|
66
|
- Need to grapple with these tensions honestly
- Need to resist “retreating” back into the “individual sin” paradigm
alone
- Need to recover a deeper biblical sense of sin, prophecy, conversion,
and reconciliation
|
|
67
|
- If we move to integrate the Sacred Claim, what might change?
- Different emphases?
- Different insights?
- Different pastoral responses?
|
|
68
|
- Basic twin dynamics
- Sin-->repentance-->conversion (on the part of the sinner
primarily)
- Sin--> forgiveness-->reconciliation (on the part of God, and the
community)
- Confession of sin--not denial; forgiveness of sin--not “obliteration” of
the fact of sin
|
|
69
|
- We are still a pilgrim church, an ecclesia semper reformanda.
- Thus, need to deal with, but also live through,
- my own sins
- and the sins of others,
- and of the institution
|
|
70
|
- Spirituality of discernment and dialogue
- Spirituality of growth and liberation
- Spirituality of involvement
- Spiritual of ministry: Ambassadors of Christ
|
|
71
|
|
|
72
|
- For and with whom, is reconciliation most necessary?
- Keep in mind that the key to the whole pastoral encounter is not
deciding who is “right” or even what the “correct” decision is,
- But rather, how can this person be brought into deeper communion with
God and God’s family
- Thus, center on reconciliation!
|
|
73
|
- Christ has no body on earth but yours
- No hands on earth but your hands.
- Yours are the eyes through which He looks out with compassion on the
world.
- Yours are the feet with which He chooses to go about doing good.
- For as He is the Head, so you are the members
- and we are all one in Christ Jesus.
|